George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four: A Quick review and Interpretation

Nineteen Eighty-Four, written by George Orwell and published in 1949 is a dystopian fiction. It’s one of the most famous novels of its genre. However, it may not be surprising that the book’s ideas are known to people who haven’t even read it! (There have been at least one survey where Nineteen Eighty-Four was ranked as the book people claimed they had read when they hadn’t.)

Not many novels are as well-known about and carefully analyzed as Nineteen Eighty-Four. However, the label “nightmare dystopian vision” does not accurately describe what this novel is all about. Before we offer an analysis of its themes and origins, let’s take a brief look at the plot first: In 1984 Winston Smith lives in Oceania where he works for Tribune’s Ministry of Truth revising historical records to make them agree with Oceania party lines while dreaming that they were true. His job seemed easy until his government decides to rewrite history by eliminating any trace of President Goldstein who had lead a rebellion against their regime but was defeated long ago; which means Winston will have to alter records from before his time so that it appears he never existed But when he starts questioning whether life would be better if things like love or sex were outlawed then everything changes.

 Summary of the plot of Nineteen   Eighty-Four

The United Kingdom was renamed Airstrip One in 1984, and it is now a province of Oceania.The state itself is ruled by ‘the Party’ with their politics being described as Ingsoc (English Socialism). Big Brother leads this party which keeps its citizens under submission through various methods – one of them being fear.

The novel is filled with surveillance. It has hidden microphones that can identify not only what you say, but also who says it– and these are planted everywhere: in the countrysides and urban areas alike. The monitors on the two-way telescreens are used to capture any dissidents in society – they disappear from society when discovered, all trace of their existence wiped out. People hardly have food because there is a lack; people go about constantly afraid for their lives as well.

In this novel, the setting is London where Trafalgar Square has been renamed Victory Square and the statue of Horatio Nelson atop Nelson’s Column was replaced with one of Big Brother. With these touches, Orwell defamiliarizes a 1940’s London which his original readers would have recognized. He does so by showing how this familiar place might be transformed if it were to come under totalitarian rule in the future.

The main character of this novel is Winston Smith, who works at the Ministry of Truth and alters historical records so they are in line with the state’s latest version. Even though his day job involves working for the Party, Winston longs to escape from their oppressive control. He hopes for a rebellion

Winston meets the owner of an antique shop who, after some convincing, sells him a type of diary where he can record his true feelings towards The Party. Although Winston is disappointed to find that the working-class ‘proles’ are lacking in political understanding when he visits them, they still have potential and will be instrumental in any revolution. 

Meanwhile, Winston suspected O’Brien, who also works with him, of being part in a hidden resistance movement known as Brotherhood, which was founded by Big Brother’s nemesis, a person named Emmanuel Goldstein. At lunch with another colleague named Syme, he learns that English language is being rewritten as Newspeak so as to control and influence people’s thoughts. This idea is such that if there are no words in their minds for this particular thought then they won’t be able to think it at all.

O’Brien summons Winston to his flat, revealing himself a member of the Brotherhood, the anti-Party resistance, as Winston had foreseen. He offers Winston a copy of the book written by the Brotherhood’s head, Goldstein.Winston is charged with making further historical alterations to old newspapers and documents to reflect the change in Oceania’s enemies during the ceremonial Hate Week. Winston and Julia, meanwhile, are surreptitiously reading Goldstein’s book, which describes how the Party maintains its dictatorial rule.The huge majority of the populace known as the ‘proles’ (derived from ‘proletarian,’ Marx’s term for the working classes) holds the key to overturning the Party, as Winston had feared. It claims that if the people rise up against the Party, it may be overturned.

However, shortly after being arrested and detained, Winston Churchill and Julia are shopped to the authorities by a man named Mr. Charrington (whose apartment above his shop they were using for their illicit meetings).It turns out that he and O’Brien both work for The Party’s Thought Police. At the Ministry of Love, Winston learns from O’Brien that Goldstein’s book was actually written by him and other members of the Group, and that the Order may not even exist. 

Winston is placed in front of a wire cage housing rats, which he dread more than anything else, in Room 101, a room in which a prisoner is subjected to their biggest fear. Winston betrays Julia, wishing she might stand in for him and bear the brunt of his suffering. Winston is let free after his retraining, but he is effectively living under a death sentence: he knows that one day he will be summoned by the authorities and shot for his previous betrayal. 

When he encounters Julia one day, he discovers that she, too, was tortured in the Ministry of Love. They’ve both deceived each other and are no longer together. Winston accepts that the Party has prevailed and that ‘he adored Big Brother’ towards the end of the storey.

Analysis of the Nineteen Eighty-Four

Nineteen-Eighty Four is probably the most famous novel about totalitarianism and one of the dangers in allowing a one party state where democracy, freedom of speech, and even freedom to think are outlawed. This book was often analyzed as warning against what could happen if creeping totalitarianism were allowed into Britain after people had been exposed to such horrors in other countries like Nazi Germany or Soviet Union. In reality this book has been called “prophetic” and an “unsettling nightmare vision” because it exposes these types of regimes’ dangers before they actually happened so vividly that many readers feel as though Orwell was able to predict them correctly with no error at all. 

It is not only science fiction stories that are set in the future. They are grounded on ideas surrounding life and society as they exist at the time of their publication, making them more than just a guess about what is to come.In 1984 by George Orwell, for example (set in London during World War II), it reflects on totalitarianism which was already established social idea when he wrote it. By then, Orwell had long been an opponent of such practices while writing his experience fighting against Franco’s forces in Spain with democratic socialism as one goal. He noted this explicitly “in my book”, unlike other novels where he has said that things like people being enslaved could occur anytime or anywhere because there were no references so far. Output: In contrast to many works of literature set today or tomorrow – most dystopian tales use their imagined setting merely as a medium through which they express some pre-existing view concerning how societies can function or malfunction according to authorial preference . For instance; Nineteen Eighty-Four (Orwell) brings up issues related to Britain during WWII Germany and post war Europe . As such , we call these tales critiques from within rather than predictions about what will happen

In his analysis of Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell’s 1949 novel, Jeffrey Meyers argues convincingly that instead of being a nightmarish vision of the future or some sort of speculative work (Reader’s Guides), it is actually a ‘realistic synthesis and rearrangement – in truth as much as anything else – familiar materials.  

And this was precisely what made Orwell such an interesting writer: he wasn’t able to come up with original imaginative thoughts but rather clear-headed critical analyses that became all too real – which can be seen in his essays. He had no unusual talent for making things fantastical but he did have an uncanny abilities when it came time to scrutinize reality; hence why we call him “a man who saw. Nineteen Eighty-Four, in Meyer’s words, is “practical” rather than “fantastic.

It should also be noted that while there may be some features found within the novel which make people think its otherworldly conceits are just fantasies – like how Winston Smith creates The Brotherhood without ever telling us where they’ve been hiding out all these years? Or how the existence itself has never been acknowledged by anyone until now? But if you were reading carefully then you would .

Orwell’s intention, as he states in his introduction, is to explore the totalitarian ideas that had ‘taken root’ among intellectuals all over Europe and bring them out ‘to their logical conclusions’. Like much classic speculative fiction – and Ballard’s novels are another example of this – Orwell’s futuristic vision is more a reflection of contemporary anxieties than anything else. And it continues to depict the various regimes like Nazi Germany or Stalinist Russia levied against London during WWII (Meyers argues Nineteen Eighty-Four). In other words: Orwell wants us to understand what could happen with such ideologies transposed into our current lives if they were given free reign over society – hence why Margaret Atwood has also used Western Union in her novel The Handmaid’s.

Orwell’s time working at the BBC in London during the first half of WWII was certainly seminal to many of his Nineteen Eighty-Four ideas, as is well-documented within and around the book. Some features were inspired by specific places, like The Ministry of Truth being reminiscent of a room that Orwell had been forced to attend tedious meetings in with an authoritarian bureaucracy, while Room 101 may have been named after a room on one floor at Broadcasting House where he would come up for air–not literally–during those same meetings. As for technology featured in this novel about fascism and surveillance societies? It isn’t far from what we see today: “telescreens” (TV screens) are just an extension on television sets already here. While not wholly innovative or imaginative leaps forward by Orwell himself given TV was established back 1936 but WW2 pushed its production back somewhat.

George Orwell studied life in Soviet Russia and it is clear that many of the details he found, like rewriting history, suppressing dissident literature and controlling people’s language even their thoughts themselves were derived from this. Surveillance was also a key element of Stalinist regime- just as it was in other communist countries across Europe. The moustachioed figure Big Brother may have been inspired by Josef Stalin himself – not only did Orwell borrow some ideas for Nineteen Eighty-Four but even the terms ‘thought crime’ and ‘thought police’ predate him; they first appear earlier to 1934 when examining Japan according to an article about totalitarianism published at the time

The Party is, in the words of Winston Smith’s interrogator O’Brien, “the mind that thinks for you. They are all about domination and control. The people who reside under their rule are not allowed to be creative or question them. They’ve taken away everything from these people that makes life worth living–particularly freedom. One thing they managed to do was completely thwart any feelings of love through hate by forcing marriage between members loathe each other out of fear for themselves and others; this also happened during Stalin’s regime as well where many Russians loved him even when it resulted in deprivation rather than a thriving society like prior before his reign began (when there were freedoms). 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *